The duty to disclose takes into account the degree of probability of the risk and its seriousness. Thus, an unusual or improbable risk should be disclosed if its effects are serious. Conversely, a risk of minor harm should be disclosed if it is inherent or a probable result of the process: Rawlings v. Lindsay (1982), 21 C.C.L.T. 301 (B.C.S.C.).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.