Can statements made to doctors as recorded in clinical records qualify as business records?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Smith v. Wirachowsky, 2009 BCSC 1434 (CanLII):

In Seaman v. Crook, Mr. Justice Metzger held (among other things) that statements made to doctors as recorded in clinical records which qualified as business records under s. 42 of the Evidence Act, are admissible to prove that the plaintiff did make those statements, but not to prove that the statements were true (see paragraph 14 – 3).

Other Questions


What is the evidentiary significance of statements by a party recorded in a clinical record? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there an exception to a trial judge's ruling in a medical malpractice case where a physiotherapist and a treating physician recorded statements in a clinical record? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a husband's contribution to a business considered a family asset in determining if the business asset is a business asset? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have inconsistent statements been put in clinical records? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the clinical records of a doctor admissible for the purposes of medical malpractice? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving a claim of discrimination against a doctor who is not a qualified doctor? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for admitting a plaintiff’s statements in a clinical record? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts treated statements in clinical records? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a complete absence of a clinical record relevant to the evidentiary use of the records? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there an occasion of qualified privilege where a statement was given to a person who had an interest or duty to make the statement? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.