In response, I note firstly that the entitlement to examine referred to in Richardson v. Honeywell Ltd. is subject to the requirement that the evidence sought to be adduced relates to issues on the application. Where the evidence is sought for use on a judicial review application, limitations on the admissibility of evidence extrinsic to the record means that Rules 266 and 267 will have a more limited scope than in relation to other types of applications.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.