What are the implications of a defendant's behaviour towards a plaintiff in a personal injury claim?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Andrews v Shelemey, 2021 BCSC 2221 (CanLII):

Aggravated damages are intended to take into account intangible injuries such as distress and humiliation that may have been caused by a defendant’s behaviour: Vorvis v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, 1989 CanLII 93 (SCC), [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1085 at 1099 [Vorvis].

Other Questions


Is resolution of an important part of a claim against a party in a personal injury claim against the other party to the claim substantially less impact on the balance of the claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action, can a plaintiff recover large amounts of personal injury damages from a vocational consultant? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, is there any case law where there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff in a personal injury action commence an action against a defendant in the same action against the same defendant? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the Court have jurisdiction to hear personal injury claims in personal injury cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff’s personal injury fund available for use in a personal injury litigation deduction? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing a claim for personal injury in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury claim for housekeeping services provided by a close friend, does the claim need to be reviewed carefully? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of care of a defendant in a personal injury claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a claim against a defendant in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.