What are the principles that guide the granting of an adjournment of an interlocutory suspension motion?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Law Society of Ontario v. Grant, 2018 ONLSTH 171 (CanLII):
The principles that guide the granting of an adjournment of an interlocutory suspension motion are set out in Law Society of Upper Canada v. Bogue.[1] They include the public interest, fairness to the licensee, respect for prosecutorial discretion, timeliness and proportionality in the process.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the legal test for adjournment of an interlocutory suspension motion by the Law Society of Upper Canada? (Ontario, Canada)
On an interim motion, is it more likely that the court will grant a motion to allow the motion to be heard before trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for an adjournment of an interlocutory suspension or restriction motion? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a motion to adjourn a motion for a further adjournment have to be made peremptory? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a motion of no confidence in a motion to amend the terms of a motion? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a motion for summary judgment be dismissed or adjourned if there are outstanding undertakings on the motion? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for elevated costs of a motion for a motion to amend a motion? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the principle of corporate separateness override the equitable principles of equitable principles in the context of vicarious liability? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any prejudice to a motion where the motion is not granted? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of proof for a motion for interlocutory suspension of a lawyer? (Ontario, Canada)
