On a motion for an interlocutory suspension, the issue is not whether the lawyer committed the misconduct, but whether there is a significant risk of harm to the public or the public interest in the administration of justice. Protection of the public interest is paramount, even if the allegations of misconduct are later found to be unsubstantiated. LSUC v. Nawab, [2008] L.S.D.D. No. 58, paras. 11-14, Book of Authorities, Tab 4. Law Society of Upper Canada v. Scott Mcconnell Sullivan, 2008 ONLSHP 83 (CanLII), para. 38, Book of Authorities, Tab 5. The Standard of Proof
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.