The trial judge went on to justify this finding by the fact that counsel “never asked which version was true” (the police statement or the SCAN statement). This question was not necessary. LW had adopted her statement to police as true and the SCAN statement had been adopted by her as true pursuant to S. 715.1 (R v. F.(C.C.), supra at paras. 30-44). On that basis, her evidence could not have led to a conviction against the appellant.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.