An additional factor is whether the statement was preceded by a caution that the person questioned did not have to say anything but anything he did say might be given in evidence against him. In Horvath v. The Queen (1979), 1979 CanLII 16 (SCC), 44 C.C.C. (2d) 385 (S.C.C.) Beetz J. explained that the reason for the caution is that voluntariness implies an awareness of what is at stake in making a statement to a person in authority. The interviewee has an absolute right to remain silent and not to incriminate him or herself unless he or she wants to.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.