Is it unnecessary for a party alleging a section 15 violation to produce evidence to prove the elements of discrimination?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Burnett v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board), 2002 BCSC 1112 (CanLII):

The petitioner notes that although the claimant bears the onus of proof of infringement of her equality rights in a purposive sense through reference to contextual factors, it may be unnecessary for a party alleging a section 15 violation to produce evidence to prove the elements of discrimination where “…it will be evident on the basis of judicial notice and logical reasoning that the distinction is discriminatory within the meaning of the provision”. [Law v. Canada, supra, at para. 88(10). Also see paras. 77-79].

A party alleging a Charter section 15 infringement is not required to prove matters not within her knowledge, such as whether the legislature had a discriminatory purpose in mind when enacting the impugned legislation. [Law v. Canada, supra, at para. 80].

Equality is clearly a comparative concept, which requires identification of appropriate comparators. That in turn requires “…an examination of the subject-matter of the legislation and its effects, as well as a full appreciation of context.” [Law v. Canada, supra, at para. 88(6)].

Other Questions


What is the test for determining whether a section of legislation that discriminates against an applicant based on race, ethnicity, nationality, race, gender, ethnicity or nationality violates section 15 of the Charter? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a party who has not produced evidence in favour of their position, or has no reasonable explanation for failing to call the evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has evidence been excluded from a Charter violation trial where the Charter violation was a serious one? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of the intention or understanding of a party to a transaction where a party intended to transfer a vehicle to another party? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for excluding evidence from the evidence of a breach of section 8 of the Charter? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving discrimination against a party in a human rights complaint? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of evidence used to prove the intention of a party to a transferor? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for exclusion of a party while another party is giving evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a third party responsible for the costs of a plaintiff who alleges that one of the third parties has failed to draft specifications to clearly state that certain fireproofing is to be asbestos-free? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between allegations of sexual harassment and allegations of discrimination dating back more than a decade? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.