Young v. Young involved hearsay evidence presented by the amicus curiae to prove allegations of alcoholism. Madam Justice Veit stated (at p. 69): There was, therefore direct evidence available and called both by the mother and the father relating to drinking. In my view, it would be clearly inappropriate for the court to allow hearsay evidence to be called by the amicus on this point. Considerations of convenience should not be allowed to override traditional evidentiary rules fostering trustworthiness by testing through cross-examination on such a fundamental issue in dispute.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.