Would have prevailed on appeal if counsel had considered a reasonable probability of success?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from Estrada v. Trimble, Case No.: 1:12-cv-02011-LJO-JLT (E.D. Cal. 2015):

would have prevailed on appeal. Id. at 694. A "reasonable probability" is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome of the trial. Id. The relevant inquiry is not what counsel could have done; rather, it is whether the choices made by counsel were reasonable. Babbitt v. Calderon, 151 F.3d 1170, 1173 (9th Cir.1998).

Other Questions


Is a prothonotary's order for an appeal of an order requiring the Court of Appeal to consider the issues raised in this appeal are "vital to the final issue of the case"? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does a petitioner have to prove that if counsel acted otherwise, his appeal would have been successful? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a motion for reconsideration to extend the appeal period for a motion of appeal, does the appeal process need to be adjourned until after the appeal has been heard? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for demonstrating a reasonable probability that a petitioner would have negotiated a plea bargain not requiring removal if counsel advised her to plead guilty to a charge of domestic violence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the reasonableness analysis for a decision of the Appeals Officer in a motion to appeal against a motion of appeal? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
First, if a child is removed from their home by a police officer, would they assert that the seizure was reasonable and reasonable? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the general rule of the federal appeals court not to consider new issues on appeal? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the timing of a motion for attorney's fees and costs in the wake of the Court of Appeal's decision of appeal against the Supreme Court of Justice's decision to dismiss the appeal? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for whether a person who has been found unfit to stand trial for murder by reason of reason is considered to be a "dangerous person" under s. 19(1)(a)(ii) of the Mental Health Act? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
When reviewing a sentence on appeal, can the Court consider whether the sentence was based on procedural error rather than substantive reasonableness? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.