Craig J., at pp. 379-80, then made the following references to Woels v. Mashinter, supra: “In Woels v. Mashinter, Steer J. stated that the vendor who has waived the right to rely on a ‘time is of the essence’ provision may rely on such a provision subsequently only if he apprises the other party of his intention to henceforth rely on such a provision . . . “Moreover, I agree with the statement of Steer J. in the Woels case, supra, that a vendor having waived his right to rely on a ‘time is of the essence’ provision in an agreement cannot rely on such a provision with regard to future defaults unless he specifically advises the purchaser of his intention to do so.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.