Does Central Okanagan School District No. 23 v. Renaud, 1992 CanLII 81 (SCC), [1992] 2 S.C.R. 970 mandate a different conclusion? I question whether Renaud extends to making a union liable for the payment of salary in the absence of evidence that the employer offered a certain amount of dollars and the unions chose to allocate it to one class of employees rather than another. More importantly, I read Renaud as holding that a union can be liable equally with an employer where the union has been guilty of discrimination ---not that the union must be pursued as a precondition to proceeding with a class action against the employer.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.