In that regard, I certainly did not consider myself bound by any implied findings of the jury; for example, in relation to the significant credibility and causation issues raised at trial. As emphasized in Kasap v. MacCallum, supra, the legislation clearly indicates that a judge must decide such a threshold motion, despite the obvious potential for overlap between considerations underlying that determination and considerations a jury must address in reaching their decision.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.