What are the implications of a motion being brought before the House of Commons on a motion of no confidence?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Basque v. Stranges, 2010 ONSC 5605 (CanLII):
“At the same time, full consideration shall be given to any prejudice to the party opposing the motion that cannot be compensated for by costs”: see Tanner v. Clark, ibid. principles to be applied will vary
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the standard of review for a motion of no confidence in a motion to amend the terms of a motion? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the implications of common issues that remain after common issues have been resolved? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a motion of no confidence in a motion by a judge in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for elevated costs of a motion for a motion to amend a motion? (Ontario, Canada)
On an interim motion, is it more likely that the court will grant a motion to allow the motion to be heard before trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test for bringing a motion of no confidence in the Superior Court of Justice for the purpose of setting a date for the motion to be adjourned? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for the use of a motion of common law common law for unjust enrichment? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a motion to sustain a common law common law tort for breach of a statutory requirement? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the consequence of a motion judge's decision not to bifurcate the liability and penalty phases of a contempt motion? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a party who brings the motion as well as the witnesses upon whom the moving/applying party relies have an obligation to present and present witnesses to the motion? (Ontario, Canada)
