When will a defendant be punished for the most serious crime but not for the more serious crime?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Rogers, 124 Cal.App.3d 1071, 177 Cal.Rptr. 747 (Cal. App. 1981):
When two crimes are incident to one objective, the defendant may be punished for the most serious offense but not for both crimes. (Pen.Code, 654; Neal v. State of California (1960) 55 Cal.2d 11, 19-20, 9 Cal.Rptr. 607, 357 P.2d 839).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a defendant punished under section 667, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code because he was convicted of having committed a new serious felony after suffering a prior serious felony conviction? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be held criminally responsible as an accomplice not only for the crime he intended to do but also for any other crime that is a natural and probable consequence of the target crime? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be held criminally responsible as an accomplice not only for the crime he intended to do but also for any other crime that is a natural and probable consequence of the crime? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime because of mistake or accident, is intent to commit the crime admissible? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who is convicted of receiving stolen property in one crime, but never charged or convicted of the other crime, be required to pay restitution for losses sustained in other crimes? (California, United States of America)
Is a criminal offence punishable by section 654 of the California Criminal Code for gross negligence punishable by a single crime arising from two crimes arising from a single, indivisible course of conduct? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 654 of the California Criminal Code allow a court to stay the execution of a sentence for a lesser, less severely punishable crime, but more severely punishable, crime-preventable, offence? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury use uncharged crime evidence to determine that defendant was more likely to have committed the charged crimes because he committed the uncharged crimes? (California, United States of America)
Is a criminal offence punishable by section 654 (a) of the Criminal Code of Ontario's Criminal Code punishable by Section 654, subdivision (a), punishable by the same law, punishable by a different law? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime, does other-crimes evidence admissible? (California, United States of America)
