When will a court compel disclosure of the identity of an informant at trial?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Hyatt, 565 F.2d 229 (2nd Cir. 1977):

The requirement of pretrial disclosure of an informant's identity is set forth in Roviaro v. United States, 353 U.S. 53, 77 S.Ct. 623, 1 L.Ed.2d 639 (1957), which indicates that in deciding whether to compel disclosure by the government, the trial court must balance the competing interests of the defendant with those of the government.

Given the imprecision inherent in applying a balancing test of this kind, we recognize that trial courts must have considerable discretion in deciding when disclosure is appropriate. Where, as here, it is not clear before trial that an informant's testimony will be relevant and helpful to the defense or essential to a fair trial we cannot say, as a matter of law, that there has been an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court. Roviaro v. United States, supra, 353 U.S. at 60-62, 77 S.Ct. 623.

Other Questions


Can a federal court compel disclosure of the identity of a confidential informant? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a federal court's decision not to compel disclosure of an informant's identity reviewed for abuse of discretion? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the difference between an order compelling a third party to produce information as part of a criminal investigation and a subpoena compelling that third party produce information once a criminal proceeding has commenced? ("New York", United States of America)
In a motion for a new trial, in what circumstances will the US Supreme Court grant a motion to reverse the judgment of the district court and remand for new trial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the denial of a motion to compel disclosure of an informant's identity review for abuse of discretion? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion to compel disclosure of the identity of a confidential informant? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a federal court's refusal to order the government to accept a subpoena for a confidential informer produce the same effects as a decision not to disclose the identity of a confidential informant? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the risk of tainting the trial irreparably outweigh the fact that the trial court informed the jury of appellant's rape and sexual assault convictions without knowing whether they would ever be introduced in the case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a motion for a continuance granted by the trial court on the date of trial on the basis that the trial judge abused his discretion to grant the motion? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When will a court compel disclosure of allegedly confidential information? ("New York", United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.