When reviewing a trial court's decision on the Miranda issue, does the court have to agree that a statement was obtained in violation of the Miranda Act?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Martinez, B220750 (Cal. App. 2012):
When reviewing a trial court's decision on a Miranda issue, we accept the trial court's determination of disputed facts if supported by substantial evidence, but we independently decide whether the challenged statements were obtained in violation of Miranda. (People v. Davis (2009) 46 Cal.4th 539, 586.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In reviewing a claim that the Miranda rights were violated, how have courts reviewed the evidence in the context of Miranda rights claims? (California, United States of America)
What is the scope of review for a claim that a statement was inadmissible at trial because it was obtained in violation of the Miranda rights? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing the voluntariness of a defendant's statements, or of improper police conduct, is the Miranda waiver violation or Miranda waiver violated? (California, United States of America)
Is Orozco entitled to a new trial because the trial court admitted into evidence incriminating statements he made to sheriff's deputies while in jail that violated his Miranda rights? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court erred by admitting statements by a minor regarding his knowledge of right and wrong that were obtained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the Miranda Miranda Miranda Statement? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's assertion that appellate courts review probation conditions for abuse of abuse of power, if the issue was raised in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does this court have jurisdiction to review or overturn a preliminary injunction issued by the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a bench officer issued an order for a fee under review was not the same bench officer as the judge who presided over the trial, can the court exercise a less deferential standard of review? (California, United States of America)
