Does the trial court erred by admitting statements by a minor regarding his knowledge of right and wrong that were obtained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. R.M. (In re R.M.), E068029 (Cal. App. 2018):
2. The trial court erred by admitting statements by the minor regarding his knowledge of right and wrong that were obtained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 (Miranda) and that were factually involuntary.
3. The trial court erred by excluding expert testimony that the minor lacked any "deviant sexual interests."
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When reviewing a trial court's decision on the Miranda issue, does the court have to agree that a statement was obtained in violation of the Miranda Act? (California, United States of America)
Is Orozco entitled to a new trial because the trial court admitted into evidence incriminating statements he made to sheriff's deputies while in jail that violated his Miranda rights? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted the Miranda rights of a minor who, as a minor, waived his Miranda right to be arrested? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a court admit that a statement obtained from a police interview was in breach of the Miranda rights? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that the trial court's failure to provide him with the means and subpoena witnesses to defend at trial a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to represent himself at trial reversible? (California, United States of America)
Can a statement obtained in violation of the Miranda rights be admitted as evidence in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
Is a trial court erred by failing to give a defendant separate advisement of his right to counsel and obtaining a waiver of that right? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where the trial court erred in admitting statements he made during police interrogation after he invoked his right to counsel? (California, United States of America)
What is the scope of review for a claim that a statement was inadmissible at trial because it was obtained in violation of the Miranda rights? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the Miranda rights of a defendant in a case where a confession was obtained in violation of the Miranda Rule? (California, United States of America)
