California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Grubb & Ellis Co. v. nXa, LLC,, B225096 (Cal. App. 2011):
When, as in the current case, the terms of a listing agreement provide that a broker will be paid a commission only upon the completion of a sale, the completion of the sale is a condition precedent to the payment of the broker's commission. (See Seck v. Foulks, supra, 25 Cal.App.3d at p. 575, fn. 16.) At the same time, however, the broker may be entitled to his or her commission even in the absence of the prerequisite completion of a sale when a sale was " 'not consummated because the seller, acting arbitrarily or in bad faith, prevented consummation . . . .' " (Id. at p. 575.) This rule applies even when a listing agreement provides that the payment of the broker's commission shall be made from the sale proceeds upon the close of escrow. (Ibid.; see also Collins v. Vickter
Page 11
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.