When a defendant is charged with a crime or public offense under section 15 of the California Criminal Code, can he be found guilty of a crime committed at any time?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Ahmed v. Superior Court of Orange Cnty., G051473 (Cal. App. 2016):

Section 15 defines an offense as an act: "A crime or public offense is an act committed or omitted in violation of a law forbidding or commanding it, and to which is annexed" certain punishments, including imprisonment. In the original indictment, the People set forth a wide date range in which defendants committed many acts that may constitute the offense charged. As a general matter, this was an acceptable way of proceeding. "The precise time at which the offense was committed need not be stated in the accusatory pleading, but it may be alleged to have been committed at any time before the finding or filing thereof, except where the time is a material ingredient in the offense." ( 955.) Nor is it problematic that the range may include multiple acts that could constitute the offense. A prosecutor is entitled to present evidence of multiple acts that satisfy a single offense charged. In such cases, the prosecutor must either elect which act constituted the charged offense, or the jury must be instructed to unanimously agree on a single act to return a guilty verdict. (People v. Hoye (2010) 188 Cal.App.4th Supp. 1, 4-5 ["When a defendant is charged with a single criminal act, but the evidence reveals more than one instance of the charged crime, either the prosecution must select the particular act upon which it relies to prove the charge, or the jury must be instructed that it must unanimously agree beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant committed the same specific criminal act"].)

Other Questions


Does section 27 of the California Criminal Code, section 778a, subdivision (a)(1) of the Criminal Code of California apply to a defendant who is charged with a charge of conspiracy to commit a crime committed outside of the state? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found to have committed a single physical act for purposes of section 654 of the California Criminal Code, Section 215 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 422 of the Criminal Code for carjacking? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of Section 969a of the California Criminal Code when a jury has found a defendant not guilty of a charge of assault but found him guilty of the same charge? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of section 654 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant is found guilty of a charge under Section 654, subdivision (a) of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code, Section 654 of the Criminal Code protect a defendant against prosecution for an act or omission committed during a course of conduct deemed to be indivisible in time? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for Section 654 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant is found guilty of a breach of section 654 or section 744 of the Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
Can a self-represented defendant be found guilty of a criminal act against a criminal defendant under section 352 of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654 of the California Criminal Code require a concurrent or concurrent sentence for a defendant convicted of a series of crimes committed at the same time under different criminal objectives? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of section 1387 of the California Criminal Code on the prosecution of a defendant who has been found not guilty of a charge under Section 1387? (California, United States of America)
Does a Defendant who commits an assault with a firearm under section 245, subdivision (a)(1) of the California Criminal Code commit assault with the deadly weapon under Section 245 of the Civil Code? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.