When a criminal defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support a true finding on an enhancement allegation, does the court review the whole record?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Johnson, E055133 (Cal. App. 2013):

When a criminal defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support a true finding on an enhancement allegation, this court must determine whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found that the prosecution sustained its burden of proving the allegation beyond a reasonable doubt. (People v. Ochoa (1998) 19 Cal.4th 353, 413-414.) We review the whole record in the light most favorable to the jury's finding. (Id. at p. 413.)

Other Questions


When a criminal defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction, how does the Court of Appeal review the whole record? (California, United States of America)
When a criminal defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, what is the standard of review required by the California Court of Appeal to determine whether the evidence is sufficient? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction, how does the court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the conviction, how does the court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
When the evidence is sufficient to sustain some but not all alleged damages, when the evidence does not support all of the damages, will the court reduce the judgment to the amount supported by the evidence? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the conviction, does the court review the entire record? (California, United States of America)
Does the evidence support the finding that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that the sexual assault charges against Backman were not supported by the weight of the evidence? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence support his criminal conviction, what is the standard of review used by this court? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction, how does the court review the entire record? (California, United States of America)
When a criminal defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction, what is the standard of review used by this court? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.