When a defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the conviction, how does the court review the evidence?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Harris, E062638 (Cal. App. 2015):
When a defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting a conviction, we review the entire record in the light most favorable to the judgment to determine whether it discloses sufficient evidenceevidence that is reasonable, credible, and of solid valueto support the decision. (People v. Jennings (2010) 50 Cal.4th 616, 638.) "We neither reweigh the evidence nor reevaluate the credibility of witnesses." (Ibid.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the conviction of a convicted rapist, does the court have to review the evidence in the context of section 1118.1? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction, how does the court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
When a criminal defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, what is the standard of review required by the California Court of Appeal to determine whether the evidence is sufficient? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing the sufficiency of evidence to support the conviction, how does the court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
When a criminal defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction, how does the Court of Appeal review the whole record? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence support his criminal conviction, what is the standard of review used by this court? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction, how does the court review the entire record? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing for the sufficiency of evidence to support a conviction, how does the court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the conviction, does the court review the entire record? (California, United States of America)
When a criminal defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction, what is the standard of review used by this court? (California, United States of America)
