What remedy does appellant have if he is found guilty of a charge of possession of a drug with intent to endanger life?

Appellant seeks an unqualified reversal of his conviction based upon the alleged Yurko errors as discussed herein. While we find that appellant was properly advised of his rights regarding the admissions of his two prior felony convictions, if any error did occur at the trial court, appellant's remedy is limited to remanding the case for a limited new trial on that part of the judgment concerning the two prior felony convictions. (People v. Fisk (1975) 50 Cal.App.3d 364, 372-373, 123 Cal.Rptr. 414; People v. Hernandez (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 796, 801, 160 Cal.Rptr. 607.)