What is the test of substantial prejudice in the context of a motion for dismissal of an allegation of sexual assault brought by a defendant in a criminal case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Breceda v. Superior Court of L.A. Cnty., B244574 (Cal. App. 2013):

"When applying this test [of substantial prejudice], the court should evaluate the record as a whole, taking into consideration such factors as the extent to which the lack of disclosure interfered with the grand jury's independence, and the strength and nature of the undisclosed exculpatory evidence as compared to the evidence supporting the grand jury's finding of probable cause to indict. If the accused shows it is reasonably probable that the grand jury would not have found probable cause to indict absent the disclosure error, the accused is entitled to dismissal of the indictment at the pretrial stage." (Berardi v. Superior Court, supra, 149 Cal.App.4th at p. 481.)

"[N]ot all cases involving some deficiency in disclosure and interference with the grand jury's independence will support dismissal. Rather, the court must evaluate the record as a whole, taking into consideration all relevant factors. These factors include the strength and nature of both the undisclosed exculpatory evidence and the probable cause evidence that was presented. Regarding the disclosure errors, pertinent inquiries include the extent of the impact on the grand jury's independence and the extent to which the material could 'explain away the charge.' If the record shows that sufficient evidence of probable cause remains even after considering the undisclosed evidence, this does not end the analysis. The court must still determine if there is '"'such an equal balance of reasonable probabilities as to leave the court in serious doubt'"' as to whether a properly informed jury would have declined to find probable cause to indict had it known of the omitted evidence. [Citation.] If so, the defendant has established the requisite substantial prejudice and is entitled to dismissal of the indictment." (Berardi v. Superior Court, supra, 149 Cal.App.4th at p. 495, fn. omitted.)

"Typically, appellate courts evaluate issues pertaining to fundamental fairness by deferring to the trial court's factual resolutions and then independently reviewing whether the rule of law as applied to the established facts was violated. [Citations.] Additionally, irregularities at grand jury proceedings should be closely scrutinized because protection of the defendant's rights is entirely under the control of the prosecution without participation by the defense. Accordingly, [the appellate court] will independently review the undisputed facts to determine whether [the petitioners'] rights were

Page 29

substantially prejudiced." (Berardi v. Superior Court, supra, 149 Cal.App.4th at pp. 495-496.)

"[T]he fact that the record can support a finding of probable cause does not mean there is no reasonable probability the jury would have rejected such a finding. The bolstering of the prosecution's evidence at the expense of the available defense evidence shows a reasonable probability that the jury would not have found probable cause had it been properly informed." (Berardi v. Superior Court, supra, 149 Cal.App.4th at p. 498.)

Other Questions


When a photograph of a defendant in a sexual assault case was found to have been taken in the context of an alleged sexual assault, is there any connection to the subsequent verdict of attempted sodomy? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for unanimity in a civil case where there are allegations of sexual assault against the same defendant in separate criminal cases? (California, United States of America)
What is the compelling case law in support of a motion to dismiss an allegation of sexual assault brought by appellant against him? (California, United States of America)
What is the relevant case law regarding allegations of sexual assault made against appellant in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
On a motion to strike from the criminal record of a defendant who was convicted of sexual assault, can the motion be struck from a criminal record? (California, United States of America)
Can a prosecutor add an additional charge or allegation under section 739 of the Criminal Code to the criminal complaint of a defendant in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of section 667(f)(2) of the Virginia Criminal Code Act on a motion to strike or dismiss an allegation of sexual assault? (California, United States of America)
Does the Defendant have any grounds to argue that it was error to deny the Defendant's motion to dismiss the Motion to Dismiss under section 995 of the Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
Is there any prejudice or prejudice against defendant in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.