The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Aldaco-Lopez, 956 F.2d 1168 (9th Cir. 1992):
In analyzing the sufficiency of the evidence linking the Appellant to the conspiracy, we must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the government and ask whether any rational trier of fact could have found the Appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v. Dorotich, 900 F.2d 192 (9th Cir.1990); United States v. Hernandez, 876 F.2d 774, 775 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 863 (1989); United States v. Mundi, 892 F.2d 817 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 1072 (1991).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.