California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Bowers, 104 Cal.Rptr.2d 726, 87 Cal.App.4th 722 (Cal. App. 2001):
Situations continued to arise where the interests of justice made it desirable to discharge a juror for reasons other than those expressly set forth in the statute. For example, People v. Burns (1948) 84 Cal.App.2d 18, presented a question of the propriety of substituting an alternate juror when a regular member of the panel was found, after the commencement of the trial, to be under indictment for a felony. Although this situation did not fit squarely within the language of the statute, the court believed justice would not be served by allowing this juror to remain on the panel.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.