California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from The People v. Gadlin, 78 Cal.App.4th 587, 92 Cal.Rptr.2d 890 (Cal. App. 2000):
Relevance. We see two major components to a relevance analysis in this context. First, there must be sufficient evidence in the particular case to support a contention that the syndrome applies to the woman involved. (People v. Gomez, supra, 72 Cal.App.4th at p. 415.) Second, there must be a contested issue as to which the syndrome testimony is probative. (Evid. Code, 801.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.