What is the test for "reasonable and common sense interpretation" under the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Mauro B. v. Superior Court, 230 Cal.App.3d 949, 281 Cal.Rptr. 507 (Cal. App. 1991):

[230 Cal.App.3d 962] In interpreting the subject statute, we are bound by general rules of statutory construction. These require the statute be "given a reasonable and common sense interpretation consistent with the apparent purpose and intention of the lawmakers, practical rather than technical in nature, which application will result in wise policy rather than mischief or absurdity. [Citations.]" (DeYoung v. City of San Diego (1983) 147 Cal.App.3d 11, 18, 194 Cal.Rptr. 722.)

Other Questions


When a judge refers to "common sense, common-sense, popular parlance" or "common-sense", does this mean that the judge must be able to rely solely on common sense or common- sense? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for interpreting the meaning of the word "reasonable and common sense interpretation" in the context of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for interpretation of the California Code of Civil Procedure when it comes to the interpretation of statutory interpretation? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant in a civil action be found to have breached section 425.16, subdivision (e) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act? (California, United States of America)
Does section 125.3 of the California Code of Civil Procedure apply to the construction of the statute, and if so, does the court have jurisdiction to interpret the interpretation of the law? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 17,000 of the California Code of Civil Procedure and how have they interpreted the law? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 139 of the California Civil Code, section 139 2 of the S.C. Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
Does section 140(a) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure apply to those threatening statements that a reasonable listener would understand to constitute a true threat? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant to appeal against the California Supreme Court's finding that the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure is unconstitutional? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 19996.2(a) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure when determining whether an employee has been on an unauthorized leave for a period of time? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.