What is the test for punitive damages in a medical malpractice case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Jackson v. Johnson, 5 Cal.App.4th 1350, 7 Cal.Rptr.2d 482 (Cal. App. 1992):
The jury having determined that one of the elements of malpractice, actual damages, had not been established, the punitive damages award is invalid.
c. Clark v. McClurg and its progeny
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the courts dealt with a motion to strike punitive damages allegations in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for punitive damages in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining punitive damages in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
Does section 2337 of the Medical Association's Medical Licence Review Guidelines apply to a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining excessive punitive damages in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for punitive damages in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for punitive damages in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
How has section 855.4 of the California Medical Code been interpreted in the context of medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
What is the state of the law in cases involving medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where an evidentiary privilege has been applied in the context of a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
