What is the test for making restitution under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from United States v. Coffman, No. 2:08-cr-0093-KJM (E.D. Cal. 2017):

The Mandatory Victim Restitution Act ("MVRA") requires the court to order "in addition to or in lieu of, any other penalty authorized by law, that the defendant make restitution to the victim of the offense . . . ," 18 U.S.C. 3663A(a)(1), when the offense is one "in which an identifiable victim or victims has suffered a physical injury or pecuniary loss," id. 3663A(c)(1)(B). A "victim" is "a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of an offense for which restitution may be ordered including, in the case of an offense that involves as an element a scheme, conspiracy, or pattern of criminal activity, any person directly harmed by the defendant's criminal conduct in the course of the scheme, conspiracy, or pattern." Id. 3663A(a)(2). "[I]n a case involving a conspiracy or scheme, restitution may be ordered for all persons harmed by the entire scheme" and is "not confined to the harm caused by the particular offenses to which [defendant] pleaded guilty" because "[a] conspirator is vicariously liable for reasonably foreseeable substantive crimes committed by a coconspirator in furtherance of the conspiracy." United States v. Riley, 335 F.3d 919, 932 (9th Cir. 2003) (citation omitted). Restitution is, however, limited to harm "closely related to the

Page 5

scheme, rather than tangentially linked[,]" id. at 1292 (citation and quotation marks omitted), or harm that is "reasonably foreseeable," United States v. Lotze, 192 F. App'x 598, 600-01 (9th Cir. 2006).

When, as here, a dispute arises as to the proper restitution amount, the court must resolve the dispute by explaining its reasoning, supported by the record. See United States v. Waknine, 543 F.3d 546, 556 (9th Cir. 2008). In resolving any dispute regarding the amount of restitution, the court applies the preponderance of the evidence standard. Id. (citing 18 U.S.C. 3664(e)). The government has the burden to prove who the victims are and how much loss is reasonably recoverable as a result of the offense. 18 U.S.C. 3664(e).

Other Questions


What is the test for making a defendant pay restitution under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for making a defendant pay restitution under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the impact of a federal court's imposition of restitution under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act on a defendant who failed to object at the time of sentencing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is the evidence insufficient to support any of the 12 convictions for conspiracy to make false statements, making, and aiding and abetting in making false statements to federally insured financial institutions? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the effect of a procedural error in sentencing a convicted rapist who is unable to make restitution to his victims? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the anti-marital facts privilege apply where the victim of a domestic violence crime and the victim's children are the victims of the crime? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a third party victim have standing to appeal a restitution order under the Criminal Victims Rights Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for making an order of restitution under the Victim and Witness Protection Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a person who makes a political contribution to their own campaign be denied a right to make their own speech if they are not allowed to make it free? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does an order of restitution have the effect of treating coconspirators as "victims" and thereby requiring "restitutionary payments" to the perpetrators of the crime? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.