The following excerpt is from United States v. Van Dyck, 866 F.3d 1130 (9th Cir. 2017):
We have reached similar conclusions in other contexts. For example, in United States v. Kovall , 857 F.3d 1060 (9th Cir. 2017), we considered whether a victim could appeal a restitution order under the Criminal Victims Rights Act, and concluded that the third-party victim did not have standing to do so. Id. at 1069. In United States v. Mindel , 80 F.3d 394 (9th Cir. 1996) we held that the beneficiary of a
[866 F.3d 1134]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.