What is the test for making a reply brief before the Court?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Dacey v. Taraday (In re Estate of Goldstein), A126507, No. PES-01-282503 (Cal. App. 2011):
rule is that points raised in the reply brief for the first time will not be considered, unless good reason is shown for failure to present them before." ' " (Reichardt v. Hoffman (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 754, 764.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can an appellant's failure to correct an omission in their reply brief be rectified in reply brief? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Court of Appeal consider an issue raised in a reply brief of an appellant before the reviewing court? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Court of Appeal reverse a finding that the Court abused its discretion in making a judgment in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How has the court treated the opening brief and supplemental brief in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
What are the consequences of making an error in a reply brief? (California, United States of America)
In a reply brief to the Court of Appeal for the first time, is Heather's request for attorney's fees forfeited? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1018 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant makes a statement in open court that authorizes or adopts a motion to withdraw his plea? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for making an argument made for the first time in a reply brief? (California, United States of America)
On a motion to be heard by the Court of Appeal at the Superior Court of California for a change of venue, does the Court have any jurisdiction or authority to hear the motion? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
