What is the test for limiting instruction under Rule 404(b) of the Federal Rule of Evidence?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Campen v. Greenamyer, 940 F.2d 1533 (9th Cir. 1991):
By way of limiting instruction, the judge read Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) to the jury, and stated that "Exhibits 57 and 58 are admitted for limited purpose only." RT 5-19-89 at 57-58. We review the admission of evidence under Rule 404(b) for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Brown, 880 F.2d 1012, 1014 (9th Cir.1989).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the District Attorney's limiting instructions apply to limiting instructions? ("New York", United States of America)
Is a finding admitting evidence of other acts under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) reviewed de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a district court's decision not to admit evidence within the scope of the Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) reviewed de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a federal habeas review of a claim of insufficiency of evidence in a criminal case, what are the requirements for the federal court to consider all evidence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How is the admission of evidence pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) reviewed? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does Section 5G1.3 of the Federal Guidelines for Federal Sentences apply to a defendant who is convicted of a federal charge of possession of a firearm by a federal court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the effect of a federal action for non-federal action in which a plaintiff is seeking to force a federal judge to dismiss the federal action? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the exclusionary rule apply in a motion to suppress evidence in a criminal trial in federal court when the evidence was solely the product of a state investigation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a class action under F.R. 23(b)(3) of the Federal Trade Act include claims not otherwise assertable in the federal court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a federal district court's interpretation of a federal statute a de novo review of the interpretation of the federal statute? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
