The following excerpt is from Weinstein v. Univ. of Conn., 17-3839 (2nd Cir. 2018):
A plaintiff claiming First Amendment retaliation must make a prima facie showing of (1) constitutionally protected speech, (2) an adverse action, and (3) a causal connection between that adverse action and the protected speech. Matthews v. City of New York, 779 F.3d 167, 172 (2d Cir. 2015). The doctrine in this area balances two important interests: "Government employers, like
Page 3
private employers, need a significant degree of control over their employees' words and actions," and yet, "public employees do not surrender all their First Amendment rights by reason of their employment." Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410, 417-18 (2006).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.