The following excerpt is from Hayes v. Dahlke, 976 F.3d 259 (2nd Cir. 2020):
"To prevail on a First Amendment retaliation claim, an inmate must establish (1) that the speech or conduct at issue was protected, (2) that the defendant took adverse action against the plaintiff, and (3) that there was a causal connection between the protected [conduct] and the adverse action. " Holland v. Goord , 758 F.3d 215, 225 (2d Cir. 2014) (quoting Espinal v. Goord , 558 F.3d 119, 128 (2d Cir. 2009) ). The parties do not contest that the first requirement has been met, as filing a grievance is protected conduct. See Gill v. Pidlypchak , 389 F.3d 379, 384 (2d Cir. 2004).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.