What is the test for establishing that a judgment or order of a lower court is presumed to be correct on appeal?

Because a "judgment or order of a lower court is presumed to be correct on appeal, . . . all intendments and presumptions are indulged in favor of its correctness." (In re Marriage of Arceneaux (1990) 51 Cal.3d 1130, 1133.) As a related concept, since such a judgment or order is " 'presumed correct,' " on appeal the appellant has the burden of establishing reversible error. (Denham v. Superior Court (1970) 2 Cal.3d 557, 564 (Denham).)

As part of this burden on appeal, an appellant's opening brief "must [] . . . [] [p]rovide a summary of the significant facts limited to matters in the record." (Cal. Rules of Court,² rule 8.204(a)(2)(C), italics added.) Indeed, all parties are required to provide "a citation to the volume and page number of the record" when relying on "any reference to a matter in the record." (Rule 8.204(a)(1)(C).) Appellate courts " 'cannot be expected to search through a voluminous record to discover evidence on a point raised [by a party] when his [or her] brief makes no reference to the pages where the evidence on the point can be found in the record.' " (Multani v. Witkin & Neal (2013) 215 Cal.App.4th 1428, 1458 (Multani).)