California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Mesnick v. Caton, 183 Cal.App.3d 1248, 228 Cal.Rptr. 779 (Cal. App. 1986):
These considerations and rules guide the result in the case at bench. Given the state of the evidence, and the burden of proof, we conclude that the trial court could reasonably have found that the defendant's case fell short of establishing uncertainty of the boundary, or for that matter, marking the agreed boundary or an agreement to establish a common boundary. (On the latter point, see Berry v. Sbragia (1978) 76 Cal.App.3d 876, 881, 143 Cal.Rptr. 318; where record shows no agreement as to boundary location, agreed boundary doctrine is inapplicable.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.