Does the doctrine of agreed boundaries affect the legal doctrine of adverse possession?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Eimon v. Severson, 2d Civil No. B249662 (Cal. App. 2014):
The trial court's conclusion regarding adverse possession under these circumstances does not affect the legal doctrine of agreed boundaries. The settlement of a disputed boundary by agreement differs from adverse possession in that it is based upon
Page 6
consent. (Mesnick v. Caton, supra, 183 Cal.App.3d 1248, 1256-1257 [doctrine of agreed boundaries "a last legal resort"].)
The judgment is affirmed. Respondents shall recover costs on appeal.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the agreed upon boundary doctrine defeat respondent's adverse possession claim? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for an adverse possession claim under the agreed boundary doctrine? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a court change the charge of simple possession of marijuana to the charged offense of possession of possession for sale? (California, United States of America)
Is a finding that plaintiffs failed to establish the claimed boundary line by adverse possession supported? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant is convicted of possession of a firearm by an ex-felon, is the jury required to agree on which one or more of the guns defendant possessed? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the doctrine of self-defense in cases that address other legal doctrines? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances would the Court have found that possession for sale and possession for possession of a firearm be a less favourable verdict than the previous verdict? (California, United States of America)
Is a probation order revoked after judgment affecting substantial rights affecting a defendant's substantial rights? (California, United States of America)
Is a jury required to "educate the jury on the legal page 314 of the legal Page 314" of the California Civil Code? (California, United States of America)
Is defendant's possession of a loaded firearm sufficient to permit a jury to view his possession as an implied threat of violence? (California, United States of America)
