California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Pacific/Montana, Ltd. v. Pierson, 2d Civil No. B201610 (Cal. App. 12/3/2008), 2d Civil No. B201610 (Cal. App. 2008):
Appellants also argue that the agreed upon boundary doctrine defeats respondent's adverse possession claim. We disagree. The agreed upon boundary doctrine applies to disputes between coterminous owners and has no application to this case. (See Findley v. Yuba County Water District (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 691, 699.) Appellants and respondent are not coterminous owners with respect to the strip.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.