What is the test for establishing a riparian character in a parcel of land?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Hudson v. West, 306 P.2d 807, 47 Cal.2d 823 (Cal. 1957):
In Rancho Santa Margarita v. Vail, 11 Cal.2d 501, 528-529, 81 P.2d 533, it was held that three things must be proved to establish land as riparian in character: (1) some part of the land must be shown to be contiguous to a stream or natural watercourse; (2) the land for which water is claimed must be shown to be within the
Page 810
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for establishing an easement to allow access to an area of land where there is a long-term use of the land? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing a single parcel of land? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a description of a parcel of land is sufficient? (California, United States of America)
What evidence does the court have to consider to support the proposition that the owner of a parcel of land is obligated to dedicate the land to the public use? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing an implied easement on a parcel of land where there is no prior use of the easement? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing "possible evidence to establish prima facie" of conspiracy? (California, United States of America)
Does an expert opinion need to be established to establish the corpus delicti? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that flight is established? (California, United States of America)
Is evidence of a person's character or trait of his or her character in a civil case admissible in the context of a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a larger parcel exists in the context of a claim for severance damages? (California, United States of America)
