The following excerpt is from United States v. Huss, 482 F.2d 38 (2nd Cir. 1973):
This, of course, is nothing more than a restatement of principles so clearly enunciated in Alderman v. United States, 394 U.S. 165, 89 S.Ct. 961, 22 L. Ed.2d 176 (1969). Alderman established a procedure for conducting wiretap taint hearings. It asserted that:
Alderman v. United States, supra, at 183, 89 S.Ct. at 972.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.