The following excerpt is from Singh v. Cissna, Case No. 1:18-cv-00782-SKO (E.D. Cal. 2018):
depriving the petitioner of that interest under the procedures currently in use, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; and (3) the government's interest, including the burdens of adding or substituting the procedures used. Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 (1976).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.