California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Kniss v. Teamsters Local No. 63, E064386 (Cal. App. 2017):
Kniss contends he established a probability of prevailing on his claims. We do not need to address the second-prong of the anti-SLAPP analysis because we have concluded the first-prong was not satisfied. (Robles v. Chalilpoyil (2010) 181 Cal.App.4th 566, 582.)
Page 24
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.