The following excerpt is from Tate v. Ylst, 60 F.3d 834 (9th Cir. 1995):
We review de novo the dismissal of a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Sanders v. Ratelle, 21 F.3d 1446, 1451 (9th Cir. 1994). When the district court denies habeas relief without an evidentiary hearing, it must make specific findings and conclusions on the petitioner's assertions to show that it has independently reviewed the record. Lincoln v. Sunn, 807 F.2d 805, 808-09 (9th Cir. 1987).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.