The following excerpt is from Milam v. Harrington, 953 F.3d 1128 (9th Cir. 2020):
"The dismissal of a petition for writ of habeas corpus as time-barred is reviewed de novo." Spitsyn v. Moore , 345 F.3d 796, 799 (9th Cir. 2003). "If the facts underlying a claim for equitable tolling are undisputed, the question of whether the statute of limitations should be equitably
[953 F.3d 1132]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.