California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Dunley, 203 Cal.Rptr.3d 335, 247 Cal.App.4th 1438 (Cal. App. 2016):
If two groups are found to be similarly situated for the purposes of the law in question, the next inquiry is whether the state can justify the disparate treatment. (People v. Buffington (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 1149, 1155, 88 Cal.Rptr.2d 696.) One of two tests applies in a given case: either the rational basis test or the strict scrutiny test. The rational basis test applies when the statute involves neither a suspect class nor a fundamental right. That test requires only that there is any reasonably conceivable state of
[203 Cal.Rptr.3d 344]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.