What is the test for determining whether the trial court erred in denying a petition to reduce a felony conviction for auto burglary to theft under section 490.2?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Fukumoto, G056567 (Cal. App. 2019):
Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, 744, and to assist us in conducting our independent review, counsel suggests we consider "whether the trial court erred in denying his Proposition 47 petition to reduce his felony conviction for auto burglary to theft under section 490.2." We have considered the issue and conclude it is not reasonably arguable.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a defendant petition the court that entered a judgment of conviction to recall a conviction for a felony conviction that would have been a misdemeanor under section 1170.18 of the Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
Is it permissible to use a prior conviction for petit theft under section 666 of section 667 of the California Criminal Code to elevate the theft to a felony? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether the trial court erred in denying defendants' request to review Bittar's interview with the shopkeepers? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with the issue of whether the court erred in denying defendant's petition? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether the trial court erred in instructing the jury to convict a defendant of assault? (California, United States of America)
Does a motion for a new trial need to be denied because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1170.15 of the California Criminal Code apply when a defendant is convicted of a felony (the first felony) and also convicted of dissuading or attempting to dissuade a victim of the first felony? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant claims the trial court made an impermissible dual use of a fact to support both an enhancement and an aggravating factor in his conviction for assault, what is the test for determining whether the sentence should be increased or reduced? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court erred in entering convictions of burglary and petty theft? (California, United States of America)
