What is the test for determining whether someone has a valid claim in a civil case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Wright, 60 Cal.App.4th 1242, 71 Cal.Rptr.2d 287 (Cal. App. 1998):
The case should be resolved on the basis of what actually happened and was ruled on, not just on the words used. (People v. Allen (1986) 42 Cal.3d 1222, 1260, 232 Cal.Rptr. 849, 729 P.2d 115.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for determining whether a person has a valid claim in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
What authorities have been used to determine whether a plaintiff has a valid claim in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test to determine whether a plaintiff has a valid claim in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a physician is qualified to determine whether a plaintiff has a valid claim for medical malpractice? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has a valid claim in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has a valid claim to be a plaintiff in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a person has a valid claim under the California Civil Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a court has jurisdiction to hear or determine a claim in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a person can make a claim in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
