The following excerpt is from Ark. Teacher Ret. Sys. v. Goldman Sachs Grp., Inc., 955 F.3d 254 (2nd Cir. 2020):
12 See, e.g. , United States v. Litvak , 808 F.3d 160, 175 (2d Cir. 2015) ("Where the misstatements are so obviously unimportant to a reasonable investor that reasonable minds could not differ on the question of their importance, we may find the misstatements immaterial as a matter of law ." (emphasis added, quotation marks and citation omitted)).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.